Cuts To Canada Post And Sustainable Development

Early in December, Canada Post announced that it would be phasing out door to door delivery of mail in the next five years. The move means 6,000 to 8,000 jobs will be cut along with the 15,000 expected to retire or leave the company in that time.

Canada Post has cited that increased use of digital communication and the historic decline of physical mail, as the reason for the cuts.

The mail delivery will be replaced with community mailboxes. They will announce which communities will get the first community mailboxes mid 2014.

As soon as I saw this story, the first thing that came to mind was United Nations Agenda 21.

Unknown to many Canadians, the federal government has a sustainable development strategy. Created to fulfill the requirements of the Federal Sustainable Development Act (2008).

The sustainable development strategy calls for several things. Including: Green Procurement, environmentally sound disposal of all federally generated surplus electronic and electrical equipment, and a “Greening of Government Operations”.

One of the developing greening government operations targets is to reduce the number of government vehicles on the road.

Read the full federal sustainable development strategy HERE

Read the full Federal Sustainable Development Act HERE

By cutting out home mail delivery and replacing it with community mailboxes. The federal government will be able to drastically reduce the fleet of 7,000 vehicles employed by Canada Post. Thus reducing their “environmental impact”.

Another facet of Agenda 21 is the communitization of the most basic area’s of our lives. A collectivization of our communities. Something that community mailboxes just happens to fit into.

There is no denying that Canada Post is running at a deficit. But has there ever been a time that they have not been?

So why would the federal government mislead the people on this? That is simple!

The environmental lobby is not very popular and is known to be economy destroying. Why would they openly state that they are cutting 8,000 jobs to go green? People would be outraged and the government would face a lot of resistance to the plan.

This is being handled in the same way that all area’s of sustainable development is. With total stealth. Masking the true agenda under a pile of half truths and deceit.