A List of Phone Calls to Government Agents Questioning Them About Fluoride
OCCURRENCE OF EVENTS
On Feb 6 2013, I spoke with Paul A Parete ([email protected] ),. told him concerns about inorganic fluoride accumulating in Lake Ontario. In the same day he e-mailed me back with this link :
http://www.ec.gc.ca/toxiques-toxics/Default.asp?lang=En&n=98E80CC6-1&xml=B5A7BDCF-845F-468F-AA3E-02B1B18584F1 , I read all the information he provided me with.
Paul and I also spoke about hydrofluorosilicic acid where he agreed that it is toxic and is not a naturally occurring inorganic fluoride and it should be handled by MSDS in it’s pure form.
He called me back on Feb 7 2013, to tell me that hydrofluorosilicic acid is not the type of acid/fluoride that municipalities use to fluoridate drinking water where I informed him he was wrong.
On March 6 2013, I spoke with the Plant Manager of Woodward Water Treatment Plant in Hamilton Ontario ,Ian Routledge, and he verified that it is that specific acid that is used to fluoridate the water.
Hydrofluorosilicic acid (H2SiF6) is a toxic waste product, from the phosphate fertilizer production industry which contains silicofluorides/fluorosilicates, plus trace co-contaminants of arsenic, lead, mercury and radionuclides.
In the report published by Environment Canada and Health Canada entitled“Priority Substances List Assessment Report (1993)” on inorganic fluorides it states in section 2.2 Entry Into Environment: “Information on the release of inorganic fluoride from the fluoridation of drinking water in Canada was not identified” I would like to know why is this not identified? Why after 20 years of this report no one in Environment Canada has even bothered to calculate this.
Anthropogenic sources of inorganic fluorides include aluminum smelting, steel production, phosphate fertilizer production, glass and enamel making, brick and ceramic manufacturing, glue and adhesive production, fluoride-containing pesticides, and fluoridation of some drinking water supplies.
Plant Manager of Woodward Water Treatment Plant ,Ian Routledge, told me they do not take out the hydrofluorosilicic acid out of the water. They let it go back into the lake. He told me they allow 0.6 ppm of the acid to go back into the lake.
I also called the Department of Health, Dr. Cooper’s office who oversees water fluoridation drinking water standards in Canada and asked his assistant some questions. I also called companies that manufacture hydrofluorosilicic acid. A list of the phone calls are below.
A LIST OF PHONE CALLS IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER
- Informing EC About Fluoride Accumulation in Lake ON
- Frankie Waking Up EC Agents to Fluoridation Factualities
- Water Sewage Treatment Plant Explains Cleansing Process and Asked About De-Fluoridation
- Informing EC Agent About Missing Data in Report About Fluoride Accumulation
- EC calling me back telling me to contact HC
- Christine Norman Telling me to Call Dr Coper and Vincenza Galatone
- Questioning & Confronting the Department of Health About Fluoride
- Calling Vincenza Galatone About Fluoride
- Asking Brenntag Canada Inc. Questions About MSDS for Hydrofluorosilicic Acid
- Mosaic Company Asked About Fluoride in the Environment
Click HERE for a playlist of all the above phone calls.
FOR A VIDEO REPORT WITH PHONE CALLS MIXED WITH HARD HITTING INFO PLEASE CLICK HERE.
OK FRANKZ.. let’s take this to the next level now.. get the standards changed!!! the interview with the first call.. about the lake.. the guy says “there are standards for the water that returns back into the lake… AND THOSE ARE THE STANDARDS I’M TALKING ABOUT, those that set the standards are 100% criminally negligent.. and are liable for damages caused by lack of being up to date with the current research in that ‘field’.. and it doesn’t matter what they are insured to do or what the higher ups tell them to do.. it is their responsibility to maintain safe water access for everyone within their assigned range, whether it be a city or a province..
they need to be held responsible for their attemped soft kill murder, and it’s up to them to prove that they were not knowledgeable and had NO suspicion that fluoride is bad, and would have to say that they have NEVER heard of anything to do with fluoride possibly not being safe.. cause if they admit they have heard something like that before that makes it a simple.. OKAY SO YOU HEARD THAT IT MIGHT BE BAD AND YOU NEVER PUT FORTH THE EFFORT TO FIND OUT FOR SURE, WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO RESEARCH, CAUSE IF IT’S NOT.. THEN WHO’S IS IT?!!!
know what i’m sayin.. go from there.
.. that is what i’m talking about frankz… great job man.