Many of us have been pondering what would be coming first, now that Harper has his majority. We are quickly finding out!
The Conservatives are making a commitment to passing lawful access legislation within 100 days of their majority government, the new bills have enormous implications for the Internet. That has never received parliamentary scrutiny and will receive limited attention.
The new bill C-51 is titled: Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act
Read the full bill HERE
I read a very good breakdown of the bill at scathinglywrongrightwingnutz.blogspot.com Which says:
Clause 11: The existing provisions of the Code regarding the offences of sending a message in a false name and sending false information, indecent remarks or “harassing” messages (the French term “harassants” currently used in subsection 372(3) of the Code is replaced by “harcelants” in the bill) refer to certain communication technologies used to commit those offences, such as telegram, radio and telephone. Clause 11 of the bill amends those offences by removing the references to those specific communication technologies and, for some of those offences, substituting a reference to any means of telecommunication. As a result, it will be possible to lay charges in respect of those offences regardless of the transmission method or technology used.
This is an exact duplicate of the process that brought thought crimes legislation, Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, to the internet and enabled the Canadian Human Rights Commission to engage in acts that were finally ruled to be unconstitutional by the very Canadian Human Rights Tribunals that rubber stamped convictions in 100% of the cases brought before it. Only this time it is to be expanded upon and enshrined in the Criminal Code of Canada. If this Bill is passed the Canadian government can throw out the reviled Section 13 of the CHRA, they won’t need it anymore because they will have something even worse to use against us.
Look very carefully at the wording of Clause 11 above. The key word is “and” which follows the words in bold text (text not bold in original document). It would be bad enough if the new law proposed making it an additional offense to use a false name (an internet alias) “while” “sending false information, indecent remarks or “harassing” messages”, like using a firearm in the commission of a robbery, but this wording makes “sending a message using a false name” a stand alone crime. Think long and hard about the implications and dangers of this part of this proposed bill.
Where are internet aliases most commonly used by Canadians today? They are almost universally used in internet forums, bloggers’ comments sections, and comment sections of other websites. This law will make using an alias a crime. It is not likely they will try to prosecute everyone using an alias online but it will give the government the means to identify and criminalize anyone who writes anything the government disapproves of. Imagine an internet where Canadians were forbidden by law to speak anonymously.
Think it would never happen in Canada? Never forget what happened with the CHRC and never give those who enabled that disaster the means to do it again.
Michael Geist (michaelgeist.ca) writes:
The substance of the proposals that have the potential to fundamentally reshape the Internet in Canada. The bills contain a three-pronged approach focused on information disclosure, mandated surveillance technologies, and new police powers.
The first prong mandates the disclosure of Internet provider customer information without court oversight. Under current privacy laws, providers may voluntarily disclose customer information but are not required to do so. The new system would require the disclosure of customer name, address, phone number, email address, Internet protocol address, and a series of device identification numbers.
While some of that information may seem relatively harmless, the ability to link it with other data will often open the door to a detailed profile about an identifiable person. Given its potential sensitivity, the decision to require disclosure without any oversight should raise concerns within the Canadian privacy community.
The second prong requires Internet providers to dramatically re-work their networks to allow for real-time surveillance. The bill sets out detailed capability requirements that will eventually apply to all Canadian Internet providers. These include the power to intercept communications, to isolate the communications to a particular individual, and to engage in multiple simultaneous interceptions.
Moreover, the bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory structure for Internet providers that would mandate their assistance with testing their surveillance capabilities and disclosing the names of all employees who may be involved in interceptions (and who may then be subject to RCMP background checks).
The bill also establishes numerous reporting requirements including mandating that all Internet providers disclose their technical surveillance capabilities within six months of the law taking effect. Follow-up reports are also required when providers acquire new technical capabilities.
The requirements could have a significant impact on many smaller and independent Internet providers. Although the bill grants them a three-year implementation delay, the technical capabilities extend far beyond most of their commercial needs. Indeed, after years of concern over the privacy impact associated with deep-packet inspection of Internet traffic (costly technologies that examine Internet communications in real time), these bills appear to require all Internet providers to install such capabilities.
Having obtained customer information without court oversight and mandated Internet surveillance capabilities, the third prong creates a several new police powers designed to obtain access to the surveillance data. These include new transmission data warrants that would grant real-time access to all the information generated during the creation, transmission or reception of a communication including the type, direction, time, duration, origin, destination or termination of the communication.
Law enforcement could then obtain a preservation order to require providers to preserve subscriber information, including specific communication information, for 90 days. Finally, having obtained and preserved the data, production orders can be used to require the disclosure of specified communications or transmission data.
While Internet providers would actively work with law enforcement in collecting and disclosing the subscriber information, they could also be prohibited from disclosing the disclosures as court may bar them from informing subscribers that they have been subject to surveillance or information disclosures.
Few would argue that it is important to ensure that law enforcement has the necessary tools to address online crime issues. But these proposals come at an enormous financial and privacy cost, with as yet limited evidence that the current legal framework has impeded important police work. In fact, when then Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan tried to justify his lawful access package, he pointed to an emergency situation that I later revealed (via access to information) had nothing to do with the Internet.
Now here is my 2 cents.
To all of us who have been paying attention to what is happening to our country, this should come as no surprise. This bill was actually introduced in November of 2010, but it did not move forward. Until now, when Harper has his majority and can push through whatever he wants. Another secret initiative with no substance behind the official explanation for it.
The reality is that the ruling class of this world are not happy about the internet and its freedoms. Alternative media has risen to all time highs and only continues to grow. Their control is being broken. Issues like the North American Security Perimeter, the NAU, and the total clearance sale of every fundamental piece of our sovereignty are being blown wide open!
In the elites eyes, this must be stopped. So why not make it a crime, and totally monitor the internet for political dissidents. Only makes sense right?
We have got one hell of a fight starting, on countless fronts! Are you ready for it? Or are you going to go quietly into the night?
this has to be against the law to do as in a charter violation.
Anyone? And with 2 justices stepping down even if it is will it matter anymore.Might as well all of us join the hells angels.
An open letter to the Canadian Government
As a Canadian citizen who last voted Conservative, I am almost in a state of disbelieve upon hearing the details of the Conservative governments new “Online Surveillance Bill” Bill C-51.
In the past, I have allowed myself to believe that much of our various governments right-stripping legislations although misguided, and largely unjust, were created with the intentions of “protecting” the Canadian public, or garnering votes. This new proposed legislation however makes it impossible to ascribe any such motives, no matter how much I might like to believe so.
Bill C-51 is nothing less than the death of any expectation of freedom or privacy in the former free country of Canada. To try and deceive the Canadian public, gullible as we have so far been into believing that this bill is in any way designed for our own protection, just demonstrates how much we have allowed our governments to get away with.
This bill is about as much directed against pedophiles as the GST was directed against terrorism.
What this bill is so transparently directed toward, it the goal of controlling the population of Canada, through pervasive surveillance, the end of being able to write or think for yourself without the Government being able to data mine, tabulate, and influence it’s own citizens.
How many pedophiles do you think are out there, and what other measures have you considered?
I anticipate the “If it saves just one child it’s worth it” response. So, ban alcohol. If it saves one life isn’t it worth it? how many children’s lives have been destroyed by alcohol? More than have been preyed upon by pedophiles certainly. But the government realizes revenue from alcohol, and the majority of users do not abuse it by driving impaired, or going home drunk and beating their partners or children or spending their money on booze instead of providing for their children. The majority of internet users are not pedophiles.
Ask the police what they see more of in the course of their duties, internet child porn, or families torn apart by alcohol. Don’t any of you dare use the “save one it’s worth it excuse”.
What did the child pornographers do before the internet? Are you going to tell the Canadian public that there was no kiddie porn before the net? Perhaps that the net created child pornography? While I have no direct knowledge, I submit to you that it DID exist before the net. Probably using the Canadian Postal Service. So, after spending billions, implementing C-51, the pedophiles will likely once again use the mail. So what then? Have all postal communication opened, logged, scanned and databased? After all, if it saves even one….
No, nobody in this country believes for a second that C-51 is about your government protecting children.
The police already have the ability to obtain all the information C-51 portends to provide them. Warrants are almost never denied the police.
C-51 however means that the police will not be accountable for singling out citizens, with no accountability. No need for “just cause”, now it will be “just cuz”!
Where does it stop? you want to tap into our cell phones without warrant, and listen to us in our vehicles without warrant.
Again, I anticipate the response: “Why do you care if you have nothing to hide”
Well for all the whining the police make about the Charter protecting an accused through the right not to make a statement, it is of note that no criminally accused police officers, or any of their “police associations” lead by example, and compel accused officers to make a statement. A bit of a double-standard don’t you think?
So, if you have done nothing wrong, and have nothing to hide, then why don’t the members of this government publish their email addresses, and passcodes, allow the Canadian public to monitor their cell phones and listen to their conversations in their vehicles through Onstar?
You don’t expect us to allow you to kill freedom and privacy without you leading by example do you? Or do you have something to hide? Maybe your office and home phones should be monitored as well.
I remember what our Grandfathers fought and died for in the last world war. Freedom.
There is no motive I can see other than a level of mass surveillance and control that Hitler and Stalin would come back from their respective graves for. Come to think of it, maybe they have.
If it were not for a free internet, recent events in the middle east, Tunisia, Egypt and Libya might well not have occurred, certainly the memory of Mubark, and the ghost of Gaddafi are smiling upon your efforts. If they had only your level of insidious malevolence, they would surely still be in power, their security forces “protecting the people” from terrorists and pedophiles. In this light, your motives become sickeningly transparent.
I believe in the right to be free from unreasonable government interference.
I am willing to die for what I believe in. Freedom. Exactly like the Canadian Government asked my Grandfather to do.
Do you believe in what you are doing? Really believe that spying on Canadians is the only course worth pursuing? Enough to die for? I’ll bet not. Shame on you all. You have shown me, and the rest of the Canadian people who have eyes what you stand for. Most pedophiles only abuse a few children. Your government wants to molest them all.
Heil Harper!
Sieg Heil!
Not.
The existing Government in all it’s expressions will continue to hold no power under color of law unless we are personally consenting or submitting to it!
These red, white and blue Conservatives are truly a “made in the USA” political party. They take orders from Israel and AIPAC.
They only represent 38% of Canadians (the ones with shrivelled brains).
I’m in the other 62%, so Harper and his douchebags can go to hell where these warmongers belong.
I will gladly be the teat case when it comes to speaking the truth about Evil Israel.
Harper must be exstatic now….Hes a power mad fool who is under the control of the US intelligence services.
There will be the Nazification of Canada as well, as US, it was almost inevitable, but i had hopes the quiet steady Canadians would stand firm against it.We are all going to have to get used to this new police state mentality and keep our papers in order at all times.
Anonymity provides users including my little brothers and sisters a shield against perverts. If this is taken away it will endanger the children. Privacy is a right not a privilege. I use my real name here because I am not ashamed of my stance here it is right.
This is corruption of the government by lobbyists who pay for election campaigns. Do a search of the contributors of the politicians passing this and you will see the truth in this. These politicians put their lobbyists interests ahead of the safety of our children.
Last I checked, I lived in Canada, not China! This country is becoming more communist than conservative, and Harper will be losing votes very quickly once the general public is made aware of this bill. The taxpayers want to pay for their security, not to ensure that their privacy and rights are squashed under the large, greedy, lobbyist following hand of the “law”. I’ll NEVER bow down to this type of behavior from a government that gets worse and worse every day. Shame on you Harper! Why don’t you make ALL of your personal information and internet activities public for us to pull apart to see if there’s any injustice within. Pathetic! Shameful! I can only imagine how much Harper made from the MPAA/RIAA and other US based lobby groups.
I have read this Bill (the actual bill and not just the summary) and I am not quite sure what you have your knickers in a knot about.
Most of the changes to the Criminal Code are to keep the existing laws applicable in the 21st Century. (These laws existed long before Harper had a majority government btw.) It will not make posting under an alais, as I have done here on your blog, illegal. If you read the section of the criminal code this bill references, you will see the defined intent of the section of the code – and it’s not to give people posting on blogs or forums a hard time. I’ll leave it for you to actually read because I support people getting to know the Canadian Crim Code.
I see you getting in a snit about the addition of an “and” in a list in your beginning paragraph. The Bill is merely defining which sections of the code will be updated using an inclusive rather than definitive form of communication (ie: apply to online communications).
I find your comment about “without court oversight” to be very interesting. I would suggest you get your hands on the actual Bill. It will clear up some confusion for you (that is assuming you have a decently high level of reading comprehension).
I have been so bewlidreed in the past but now it all makes sense!
Oh and btw, before you fob me off as a Conservative you should know I am not a fan of Harper. I am extremely scared of what he is going to do to our country in the next few years. I just don’t see getting all worked up about this Bill is all.
We need to remove the pointless governments that do not serve the public for good. In this case, its the whole worlds corrupt war hungry and murdering politicians that need to be removed and censored from reality.
Don’t panic folks, I’ve been keeping my eye on this for a while and have created away to protect your privacy from big brother.
I suggest researching VPN’s (Virtual private networks) on google if you are not familiar with the term.
Here is a VPN provider $6.50 CAD/month (hosted in sweden) : https://www.anonine.com/en
This isn’t new technology certainly isn’t a secret.
To go hand-in-hand with your VPN, I’ve designed a “Proof of Concept” to router your entire network through your VPN to protect ALL Data that passes through your network : http://allianceonline.info/poc/
It’s not as complicated as it looks and is pretty easy/cheap to make. If you have any questions or need help just leave a comment at the bottom of the POC page.
guys, read carefully. it doesnt mean YOU have to disclose your name to anyone. it means any harrassants have to do so and if not they are committing a crime.
in other words, THIS IS AN ANTI SPAM BILL.
How many times do they need to bring up new bills after losing past bills? Again and again, again and again! There should be a moratorium for these kinds of bills! One every 25 years! We can’t just keep voting no until they make us vote yes!
This is Canada, last I checked it wasn’t communist, and we didn’t need to be watched 24/7. The government must stop taking away our freedoms, we don’t deserve this kind of treatment. We must fight!
Adolph Harper is a tyrant of epic proportions. I can’t believe that even 38% of Canadians can’t or choose not to see this however I suspect that most of that 38% were voting for the ‘charming man who came by the home a few weeks ago’ while thier shaky hands were guided to the check box that tired eyes could no longer see. Remember Edna, he’s the one who promised to increase our pensions and put all those nasty criminals in jail. In the mean time he will find a way to criminalize the majority who didn’t vote for him and thusly have ultimate control over all dissention. He gained the majority virtually without a public campaign or platform and with selective and targeted personal appearances in constituancies that he could easily sway with misinformation. This man is smart, sneeky and manipulative, and his deviousness scares the hell out of me. Be afraid, be vociverous, be loud, be heard and be many.
P.S. will it be a crime to give him an alias? Is it already?
3 days ago Min. Tony Clement CPC “blocked” me from his twitter account after a short innocuous conversation. He declared I had not used polite twitter etiquette. Under this new bill, I imagine he would just report me to the authorities and have me blocked from any/all internet use and/or arrested.
That anecdote aside, this bill is horrendous and the repercussions are unthinkable. How do we go about stopping it??? Any ideas? Harper seems hell bent on it, and capable to pushing it through with or without any feedback or approval.
And in purely practical terms, how would it even be possible for any of us even to have a twitter account for example? I’m sure there are more than one Maggie Murphy’s in this world – so how do we all have accounts under the same name… if we had 01….55555…to the name, then that would make it an alias would it not?
Let me know what we can do – I’m “going loudly into the day”
I once needed a Notary Public to stamp some official documents. during our conversation, he mentioned I could use whatever name I wanted to use, as long as it was not for illegal purposes.
While not exactly the same thing, it sounds like this could have some serious repercussions on the way the law is interpreted in other areas.
I wonder how this will effect website hosting companies? Where the forums are actually hosted and the database is stored. Or worse, for the people trying to run a forum… Kinda takes the fun outta running a forum.
Oh MG Canada…
You can add your signature to the over 44368 that signed the petition against Online Spying. http://stopspying.ca/
Everything you say CAN & WILL be used against you in a court of law. Just imagine things you may have typed online that can be taken out of context. Well now ALL of it can be used against you if this bill is passed.
Hit the Home button and click on the buttons at the top of the page to sign the Stop The Meter petition and to send the 150 page report to your MP. We need your voices added to ours. Thanks to the Stop The Meter Petition we forced the CRTC to have a hearing on Usage Based Billing on wholesalers. Well Next we need to fight Usage Based Billing by Retailers, so we need your signatures.
For those of you not convinced as to how dangerous this bill is I refer you to this letter signed by Every Privacy Commissionaire in Canada. I copied just the first paragraph. Bill C52 is also of concern.
http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2011/let_110309_e.cfm
I also refer you to a summary on the Justice Dept. Website. Both links show why the Lawful access bill will take away our rights.
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/5.html
As a group, Canada’s Privacy Commissioners remain concerned about the government’s current lawful access initiative, in particular Bill C-52, the Investigating and Preventing Criminal Electronic Communications Act. We held a teleconference on January 18, 2011 to discuss the issue and would like to relay the substance of that dialogue. While we understand the legitimate needs of law enforcement and national security agencies, as well as their challenges in the context of new information technologies, we would like to bring to your attention the following concerns about the absence of limits on the access powers, the wide scope of information required to be collected and provided by telecommunications companies without a warrant and the inadequacy of internal controls and the legislative gaps in the oversight model.
This isn’t communist. It’s fascist. Communists don’t have a monopoly on repressive regimes. The extreme right-end tends to fascism and this is what Harper is trying to put into place in Canada.
I haven’t read the bill myself, but even if it only applies to harrassants as “I Read It” stated, it could still have expanded interpretations in court that include using an online alias for innocuous reasons. Yes, the criminal code needs to be updated for the modern context, but this needs to be done carefully, lest control-freak dinosaur luddites like Harper be enabled to introduce repressive legislature and criminalize innocuous acts.
Paul – no, it pretty much is the same thing. That’s the section of the Criminal Code that this Bill would update and it will just change the forms of communication. You got it.
It won’t affect web hosting companies too badly because they have a lot of the monitoring practices already in affect. Hate to break it to y’all but the police have been subpoenaing electronic information for quite some time now as they are legally entitled to do.
I am a bit confused as to why people are opposing our laws be brought into the 21st Century. These laws aren’t designed to spy on regular people doing regular things. They are to nail people committing fraud, distributing child pornography, etc. Do you really object to criminals being dealt with?
The reason for the concern about this Lawful Access Bill is based on this I quote from the letter signed by every Privacy Commissionaire in Canada:
“Read together, the provisions of Bills C-50, C-51, and C-52 (augmented by changes in Bills C-22 and C-29) would substantially diminish the privacy rights of Canadians. They do so by enhancing the capacity of the state to conduct surveillance and access private information while reducing the frequency and vigour of judicial scrutiny. In essence, they make it easier for the state to subject more individuals to surveillance and scrutiny.
While we understand the need for law enforcement and national security agencies to function effectively in the context of new information technologies, in our view, it would be misleading to suggest that these bills will simply maintain capacity. Taken together, the proposed changes and new powers add significant new capabilities for investigators to track and search and seize digital information about individuals.
The Investigating and Preventing Criminal Electronic Communications Act (Bill C-52)
Clause 16 gives unrestricted access to subscriber data records held by telecommunications firms. We are concerned that the proposed powers are not limited in any fashion. The privacy oversight community in Canada has expressed reservations, in a joint resolution by all of Canada’s privacy commissioners signed after the original tabling of similar bills in 2009. A copy of this resolution is attached.
We are concerned that clause 16 of Bill C-52 would give authorities access to a wide scope of personal information without a warrant; for example, unlisted numbers, email account data and IP addresses. The Government itself took the view that this information was sensitive enough to make trafficking in such ‘identity information’ a Criminal Code offence. Many Canadians consider this information sensitive and worthy of protection, which does not fit with the proposed self-authorized access model.
Currently, under section 487.013 of the Criminal Code, investigators require judicial authorization to seek client information like name, address or account numbers from a financial institution or commercial entity. As you are aware, clauses 16 and 17 of C-52 provide law enforcement, CSIS, and Competition officials with warrantless access to “subscriber information” held by telecommunications companies. In our view, law enforcement and security agency access to information linking subscribers to devices and devices to subscribers should generally be subject to prior judicial scrutiny accompanied by the appropriate checks and balances.”
The additional issue is that this data collection leaves us vulnerable to both corrupt officials & more prone to hackers. Without court oversight there is no one to hold accountable if we have been unjustly accused or if corrupt officials sell our data.
This will also be implemented at out expense. We already pay almost the highest cellphone & internet prices in the world. You can get 20 MBps unlimited internet in Russia for $25.00 Canadian.
I spy,
You have taken clause 16 out of the Bill without reporting preceding sections such as:
2.(2) Nothing in this Act derogates from any power in the Criminal Code, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act or the National Defence Act to intercept communications or to request that telecommunications service provid- ers assist in such interceptions. [That means section 487.013 of the Criminal Code would remain in tact and applicable.]
3. The purpose of this Act is to ensure that telecommunications service providers have the capability to enable national security and law enforcement agencies to exercise their authority to intercept communications and to require telecommunications service providers to provide subscriber and other information, without unreasonably impairing the privacy of individ- uals, the provision of telecommunications services to Canadians or the competitiveness of the Canadian telecommunications industry.
Section 16 states who can make a request and the purposes for which they can make such a request. It states you have to be a law officer (or other designated official) who is requesting the information for the purposes of law enforcement. So a designated person such a police officer, cannot make a request for information if he wants to check if his wife is cheating or him or what websites his kid has been accessing.
Section 17 states an officer may request the information in matters of urgency where they need to prevent harm to a person or to prevent an unlawful act from being committed. This is nothing new. You already see this in the Criminal Code as exceptions to warrants. Example: if a police officer is at your front door and they hear someone screaming inside, they can break down the door and enter your premise without a warrant to prevent a crime from taking place.
As I said, everything you are arguing is already accounted for in the Criminal Code, to which this Act must adhere per the wording of this Bill.
Oh and in terms of cost:
(3) The Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police or the Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, as the case may be, must pay the telecommunications service provider an amount that the Minister considers reasonable towards the expenses that the Minister considers are necessary for the service provider to incur initially to comply with an order made under this section.
(4) The Minister may provide the telecommunications service provider with any equipment or other thing that the Minister considers the service provider needs to comply with an order made under this section.
Is there anyone posting comments including the original poster who has actually read the Act and is versed in the Canadian Criminal Code? I don’t mean to be insulting but I am starting to wonder.
If you read my post I quoted the Privacy Commissionaires, and I bet they read the Bill and are versed in the Canadian Criminal Code. And it is Bills C-50, C-51, and C-52 that they are concerned with. In their letter they link to their first letter of concern they wrote back in 2009.
http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2011/let_110309_e.cfm
And these lawyers are versed in it too.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5733/125/
http://www.slaw.ca/2009/06/24/canada%E2%80%99s-lawful-access-legislation-civil-rights-and-privacy-concerns/
http://blog.privacylawyer.ca/2011/04/canadian-police-state-legislation-needs.html
Ohh and if the government is going to supply the ISP’s with equipment…WHO do you think will pay for that?!?! We will.
Sorry for the double post.
Lawyer or not, that doesn’t mean people aren’t going off half cocked here. Statements such as “Clause 16 gives unrestricted access to subscriber data records held by telecommunications firms.” Clause 16 does no such thing. It doesn’t say anything about warrants, subpoenas, etc, in terms of needing them or not. However, Bill C-52 does state that “Nothing in this Act derogates from any power in the Criminal Code”.
If you read through Bill C-50, it doesn’t remove the need for warrants and only slightly amends the wording of when warrants aren’t needed (still very similar to the existing provisions in the Criminal Code).
BTW – I would never assume a lawyer is versed in the Criminal Code in it’s entirety. Law has many specializations, some of which deal only with specific sections. This isn’t really what is even in question here. Reading these bills is what is on the table and having done so, multiple times now, I see it explicitly stated the the Criminal Code remains in force.
The internet should be free. It’s the most powerful tool for spreading information that we have. Within seconds you can find opinions of anyone with internet access. I do not support any government that impedes this spread of information.
No government is impeding that spread of information – at least not with these Bills An Alias. This is about online criminal activity and getting access to information that helps apprehend criminals.
Hi my family member! I wish to say that this post is awesome, nice written and include approximately all vital infos. I would like to look extra posts like this .
Unquestionably consider that that you said. Your favourite reason appeared to be at the net the easiest thing to consider of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider issues that they plainly do not recognise about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest and defined out the entire thing without having side effect , other people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you
Nice one, i bookmarked this page on Digg under “Meet the new Bill C-51″. Kudos!
Glad to see that this site works well on my iPhone , everything I want to do is functional. Thanks for keeping it up to date with the latest.
Hello very nice site!! Man .. Excellent .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally?I am happy to find a lot of useful information right here within the put up, we need develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .
I’m a person with no criminal record and I’ve personally witnessed police pull up files on my msn and facebook account while in the back of a cruiser once. I’ve also overheard numerous stories of police doing the same with others. Just the other day I had private detectives practically force their way into my apartment without my permission on a warrant in search for my older brother on a small fraud charge. He committed fraud in order to buy the same narcotics that jail guards sell to inmates in federal and provincial jails. Remember G20 and all of our fellow Canadian’s they beat and threw in cages like filthy animals. Lets look at their control on our water supply, dumping fluoride in our drinking water. This mutagenic carcinogenic compound may be somewhat good for our teeth (so they say) but keep in mind it’s the main ingredient used in atomic bombs. Never mind the pensions all hard working Canadian’s are forced to pay into that are heavily invested into “foreign military stocks” that help fund guerrilla warfare all across the globe.
This government that claims to be Canadian sold our country down the river back in the early 70′s. Just look at the Canadian deficit and figure out the gist. Our government is corrupt beyond most people’s comprehension and that’s why they get away with their crimes.
They control our food sources, our finite resources, our rights, and our over all lively hoods. The bottom line is that these scum bag traitors aren’t truly Canadian. They are individuals like me and you who have been corrupted by foreign entities by their own vices.
IMO it’s time to reform the whole damned forsaken system for a more righteous tomorrow.
Canada a.k.a. The Village “De Ville” is secretly the vilest by far. It’s time to stand up against this evil.
WAKE UP CANADA!
It’s really a nice and helpful piece of info. I am glad that you simply shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.
Wonderful website. A lot of helpful info here. I’m sending it to some buddies ans also sharing in delicious. And naturally, thank you for your effort!
TY, great job! Exactly the stuff I had to know.
One stroke on the nail and a hundred on the horseshoe.
Just the other day I had private detectives practically force their way into my apartment without my permission on a warrant in search for my older brother on a small fraud charge. He committed fraud in order to buy the same narcotics that jail guards sell to inmates in federal and provincial jails. Remember G20 and all of our fellow Canadian’s they beat and threw in cages like filthy animals.
Thanks Sam I’ll try to help keep them like that!